(no subject)
May. 9th, 2009 12:36 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Further to the paperblogging in my con report, there's a really interesting essay on steampunk & colonialism here.
There are basically two steampunks - I'll call them the Morlock and Eloi trends. The first is about all the incredibly cool things the Sons of Martha can do, hacking metallurgy and thermodynamics and then decorating the results with random twiddly bits Because You Can, while the second is about poncing around in interesting costumes with shiny brass accessories, and generally being a Victorian Gentleman (or Ungentle Lady).
They can both be read as responses to a highly abstracted technological environment, either knowingly (punk versus goth - react to an ontological threat by spitting in its eye, or by dancing on the volcano) or unknowingly (two different and equally valid ways of Having Fun).
I think there's some perceived difference in the nature of that ontological threat, though. To the Morlock trend, it's out to destroy their agency - their ability to build, modify, control, or subvert the world around them. I'm less sure about the Eloi, though. Anyone care to venture an opinion?
(crossposted from DW)
There are basically two steampunks - I'll call them the Morlock and Eloi trends. The first is about all the incredibly cool things the Sons of Martha can do, hacking metallurgy and thermodynamics and then decorating the results with random twiddly bits Because You Can, while the second is about poncing around in interesting costumes with shiny brass accessories, and generally being a Victorian Gentleman (or Ungentle Lady).
They can both be read as responses to a highly abstracted technological environment, either knowingly (punk versus goth - react to an ontological threat by spitting in its eye, or by dancing on the volcano) or unknowingly (two different and equally valid ways of Having Fun).
I think there's some perceived difference in the nature of that ontological threat, though. To the Morlock trend, it's out to destroy their agency - their ability to build, modify, control, or subvert the world around them. I'm less sure about the Eloi, though. Anyone care to venture an opinion?
(crossposted from DW)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 06:54 am (UTC)I could see some appeal in being a Victorian lady (as long as one had money, of course).
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:25 am (UTC)All tropes have hidden ickiness, except those that pretend to impossible utopias.
PS. What's the costume in the icon? (Makes me think of tok'ra)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:47 am (UTC)All tropes have hidden ickiness, except those that pretend to impossible utopias. I'd argue that the way to get around that is to problematize the ickiness and drag it out into the open, really.
The costume - I'm not really familiar with the screen version of the original, but it's an iconized version of Sabalom Glitz from Doctor Who.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 11:07 am (UTC)Depends on your reason for doing it in the first place. We all need escapism sometimes. As there are no real worlds without ickiness, it is occasionally necessary to invent ones without.
Sometimes I read fiction to be challenged and enlightened. Sometimes I read it for a bit of fun.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 08:30 am (UTC)And actually to an extent I think steampunk does this better - not everyone is a nobleman or a lady adventurer. There's no shame in being the cabin boy on the pirate airship, or the greasemonkey on the submarine. (My own developing steampunk 'character' is a little subversive, in fact - a spy/mercenary who's brought herself up from poor beginnings with intelligence and deviousness, attended by a non-too-bright but burly ex-army chap of shadowy but undoubtedly aristocratic origins - that'd be
I'm sure there are some right-wing elements with dreams of empire, but then I've encountered that in other subcultures too - including goth, punk and SF.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 09:26 am (UTC)The Arts & Crafts movement is definitely a big influence in terms of ethos (whatever Cory Doctorow says). "Have nothing you do not know to be useful nor believe to be beautiful," William Morris said, and that definitely comes through. Functional objects such as goggles, scientific instruments, bags and clothing made of beautiful materials, embellished and made with love and care, not mass-produced and stamped out of a mould. (There's also something pleasingly subversive about taking something that was stamped out of a mould, like a water pistol or mobile phone, and making it look old and precious). And there's a make-do-and-mend aspect to it - recycling old/obsolete things such as broken clock parts, keys or bottles into new and exciting things. A reaction to disposable culture, if you like.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:27 am (UTC)Don't apologise for commenting! Your perspective on this is very interesting. Have you seen this thread (http://freakangels.com/whitechapel/comments.php?DiscussionID=1412&page=1) on Whitechapel?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 10:29 am (UTC)I can see the stepping-outside-constructs thing - Punk is all about not letting someone else set the rules for you. Cf. Hakim Bey and TAZ, I think, though that's more a Carnival sort of thing.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-09 05:51 pm (UTC)I always thought steampunk was compelling simply because of the sheer narrative potential the industrial advances and colonialist era provides: both for "non-fantasy" fiction and the escapist, fantastical fiction we actually associate with the name.
I agree that technology is key to the genre, which is why I'd disqualify Mary Poppins (in particular, as it was mentioned in your paperblog) as a potential ancestor of it simply because that story is children's fantasy in a Victorian setting. That makes me wonder what your Eloi trend actually is - does it require a Morlock-inspired setting or mindset to be separate from Victorian roleplay/culture?
To answer your question about the Eloi ontological threat: I would speculate that, like much other fantasy/sci-fi, it's the closing of doors and lack of adventure the mostly-explored, increasingly depressing modern-world with its infrequent and generally uninspiring technological jumps presents. Where the Morlock wants to retain control of their ability to create, and creates something specific in the steampunk theme to prove that they have, the Eloi is happy to simply revel in the steampunk genre (perhaps particularly in "generic steampunk" which hasn't been taken anywhere specific?), when things were (perceived) hopeful, the enterprising spirit was in full (perceived) force, and Things were waiting to be Discovered.
Well, that turned into a bit of a ramble. I hope I correctly understood what you meant by Morlock and Eloi trends, and that my speculations on the motivations of the latter (as someone who mostly enjoys fictions from the former) hasn't fallen too wide of the mark!