mirrorshard: (Silver Birch)
[personal profile] mirrorshard
My current hosting package is due to run out in a while, and I've been thinking about upgrading elsewhere. Currently I'm using 123-reg's simplest hosting package, but that doesn't let me run anything complex, and I have for quite some time now been wanting to host my own wiki. (I'd prefer Mediawiki, but other engines are entirely possible, and yes, I do want to have it on a server, or at least "server", I control if at all possible.)

Something that will talk directly to gmail, instead of my needing to forward mail through a third account, would also be nice.

Do any of you have recommendations to make? Or indeed disrecommendations?

Date: 2009-03-12 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spencerpine.livejournal.com
I use Dreamhost. They're a good budget option: they're generally cool and easy to use.

The only problems I've had are that they're occasionally down, but it's pretty rare. I can't remember the last time it happened: I just remember that it's occasionally happened. Not this year, I think.

They offer Gmail integration and MediaWiki installation, as I remember.

Graham

Date: 2009-03-12 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorshard.livejournal.com
Hm, useful, thank you! OTOH, [livejournal.com profile] psych0naut makes a good point about speed.

Date: 2009-03-12 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spencerpine.livejournal.com
Yes, fair enough. Haven't used MediaWiki in earnest.

Graham

Date: 2009-03-12 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] psych0naut.livejournal.com
I use Dreamhost. They give you full shell access on a GNU/Linux machine, so you can install whatever you want. They also have a Fisher-Price mode where you can automatically install a certain set of packages from a list; MediaWiki is one of them.

They are a good budget option, but I am not impressed with the speed of MediaWiki on their servers. Check out nothingisreal.com (http://www.nothingisreal.com/) for yourself to see how slow it is. I am considering going back to plain HTML.

Date: 2009-03-12 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorshard.livejournal.com
I see just what you mean about speed. I've started considering Wikidot, but I'm not sure whether they'll let me integrate other things easily.

Date: 2009-03-12 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashfae.livejournal.com
Powweb was fabulous. I don't know if they can do what you want, but they were absolutely amazing and I recommend looking them up.

Date: 2009-03-13 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorshard.livejournal.com
I shall investigate, thank you!

Date: 2009-03-13 11:14 am (UTC)
ext_40378: (Default)
From: [identity profile] skibbley.livejournal.com
I like Bytemark (http://www.bytemark.co.uk/) if you want a lot of control over your "machine".

Date: 2009-03-13 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorshard.livejournal.com
That looks interesting, but it also looks a lot more high-powered than I'm after (especially judging from the price point). Cheers for the recommendation, in any case!

Date: 2009-03-13 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harald387.livejournal.com
My friend John has been using iweb (http://www.iweb.com) for his site. They definitely let you do mediawiki (http://www.lordofweasels.net/harald387/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page) and even their basic package is pretty complete. He's been satisfied both with the price and the service so far.

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags