mirrorshard: (Rose Theatre)
[personal profile] mirrorshard
Through the kind offices of [livejournal.com profile] webcowgirl, I saw this last night.

The title was a bit offputting, but it proved (not really surprisingly) not to be a pretentiously gothy and overpolished job after all. The premise is simple, but ambitious - 16 scenes done in an order determined by the audience beforehand. I got there too late (thanks to the Central Line) to shuffle objects around in the bar, but I'm assured it was fun. (Relatedly - I was impressed and slightly surprised at the degree of audience investment & enthusiasm. It could be a habitual Southwark Playhouse audience... my cynical first reaction was that the actors had awfully large families. But it was a good play.)

The really impressive part was in how well the actors managed the scene changes. They were doing all the SM work themselves, and every scene needed up to half a dozen props and/or costume changes. Given that they only found out what order the scenes would be in when the audience finished mucking around in the bar when they did it (see comments), they did it really smoothly and energetically. It helped, of course, that the floor was marked out in different colours of SM's tape, and that the projection screen flashed up the number of the scene before each one.

The projection screen formed most of the set, generally with a variety of indefinably Welsh backgrounds. (I'm fairly sure I recognised part of Swansea there.) The only thing that struck me as rather off was a pair of angel wings, projected behind an actor on a stepladder - they were four inches off registration, so that one tip was clipped by the edge of the screen. That might have been deliberate, since they were also a tiny bit crooked and done in the classic slightly-mistuned-TV style, fuzzy and flickering and strewn with analogue artifacts. They did also deliberately do something which I'd normally consider a complete no-no, which is to have the actor standing in front of them lit by an off-centre profile lamp, giving a hard-edged shadow on the screen, but on top of the shoulder joint of one wing rather than in between them. The final effect was extremely disturbing and worrying, which I suspect was precisely what they intended.

"Disturbing" covers most of the play, in fact - it was a lot of hard work, continually forcing you to reevaluate your assumptions about the last few lines in an effort to work out what's going on. Gently, though, with none of that depressing twist-in-the-tale shock-revelation business. My mind definitely feels exercised. Interestingly, it felt quite science-fictional in that respect, with the parallel engagement and suspension of critical thinking about the action. Of course, I'd still maintain that treating that as a specifically SFnal trope is a case of genre exceptionalism, but that's a rant for another time.

I'm impressed with everyone involved with the production - it's not just an actor's showpiece, but a director's too, given that any of the scenes could have come first and the one which did was riveting from the get-go. The only criticism I could possibly make is that I'd have chosen a more matte paint for the stage (one actor's white top was reflected in it from time to time), but that's down to the venue not the production company.

Date: 2009-05-29 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirabehn.livejournal.com
Oh that really does sound very interesting indeed. :-)

Yay! Lovely review, also.

Interestingly, it felt quite science-fictional in that respect, with the parallel engagement and suspension of critical thinking about the action. Of course, I'd still maintain that treating that as a specifically SFnal trope is a case of genre exceptionalism, but that's a rant for another time.

*grins* It's almost certainly a rant I'd agree with, but back when I could afford to subscribe to SFX magazine, I kept wanting to write to them to get a theatre reviewer on board. Because in all other respects they interpret sci-fi and fantasy as broadly as they like, to have lots of wonderful things in their magazine. So why not with theatre too, I reasoned?

At some point I will probably subscribe to them again, and then I might well get around to offering to be their theatre reviewer writing and recommending that they get one. :-)

Date: 2009-05-29 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khalinche.livejournal.com
It all sounds very interesting, but I cannot be the only one who fell sniggering at this:

They were doing all the SM work themselves, and every scene needed up to half a dozen props and/or costume changes. Given that they only found out what order the scenes would be in when the audience finished mucking around in the bar, they did it really smoothly and energetically

Date: 2009-05-31 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'd like to clarify that the actors DID NOT know the order of the play's scenes at any point before the play. They only knew which scene to perform when it was projected on the screen behind.

Only the lighting, sound and projection operators knew the order the audience had chosen; the actors' reponse to the scene number was entirely live, and they had no idea which scene was coming next.

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags