Letters to the Times
Mar. 23rd, 2009 02:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If you haven't seen this appallingly racist cartoon in the Times, I recommend it for sheer did-they-actually-publish-that value.
Edit: please read the comments before leaving "helpful" corrections. If someone else has already said it, I don't need a "me too". Thank you.
I can't find an address specifically for complaints; comment@thetimes.co.uk gets autorejected. I've sent the following to online.editor@timesonline.co.uk as the apparent next most appropriate thing.
Sir,
I should like to register a complaint about Peter Brookes' cartoon dated 21st March 2009. It clearly depicts Barack Obama as a coconut, which is of course a strong racial slur - a derogatory term meaning "black on the outside, white on the inside".
I am disappointed that a respectable newspaper would publish such slurs, and further disappointed that a respectable newspaper can find nothing better to say about a prominent world leader so soon after his election than to comment on his race.
Yours sincerely,
mirrorshard
Edit: please read the comments before leaving "helpful" corrections. If someone else has already said it, I don't need a "me too". Thank you.
I can't find an address specifically for complaints; comment@thetimes.co.uk gets autorejected. I've sent the following to online.editor@timesonline.co.uk as the apparent next most appropriate thing.
Sir,
I should like to register a complaint about Peter Brookes' cartoon dated 21st March 2009. It clearly depicts Barack Obama as a coconut, which is of course a strong racial slur - a derogatory term meaning "black on the outside, white on the inside".
I am disappointed that a respectable newspaper would publish such slurs, and further disappointed that a respectable newspaper can find nothing better to say about a prominent world leader so soon after his election than to comment on his race.
Yours sincerely,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:17 pm (UTC)I also think The Times should be more bloody careful.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:39 pm (UTC)I very much disagree. I think of myself as a relatively well-educated person, and I *think* I've heard the term 'coconut' as a synonym for 'Oreo' or 'Bounty Bar', but I stared at it for ages trying very hard to work out why it was racist before clicking on the lj-cut and couldn't figure it out. And *I* already knew that one person considered it "appallingly" racist.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:53 pm (UTC)I think you're reading way too much into this cartoon. Are you sure you aren't just looking for an excuse to be offended?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:01 pm (UTC)The "coconut" thing ties into issues of cultural abandonment, marginalization, invisibility, and all the painful so-you-think-you're-too-good-for-us stuff.
Cultures are very much not symmetrical - it's one thing to move from a culturally dominant system to a less-dominant one, but quite another to do it the other way around. (There's also the issue of safe-for-white-people, not-safe-for-others.)
It can be very much an "I can use any word I want, but what the hell did you just call me, PAL?" issue too.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:18 pm (UTC)Throw the damn thing away and open a tin of coconut milk instead.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:21 pm (UTC)(I mostly just watch the Simpsons for Lisa.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:30 pm (UTC)I actually hadn't been aware of coconut used in the Oreo/bounty bar sort of way at all. I just tend to assume that using tropical fruit as an image when portraying someone of colour is a Really Bad Idea (cf. Boris Johnson and "watermelon smiles"). And also tend to assume that most other sensible people see it as such as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:35 pm (UTC)Of course, I'm fairly sure that all of us here discussing the matter on Sam's LJ are white (as I assume are at least most of the people on
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 05:23 pm (UTC)Definitely. But knowing that 'coconut' had a specific meaning might make people more likely to see a coconut in the cartoon rather than a bowling ball.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 05:53 pm (UTC).. and the coloured-on-the-outside-white-on-the-inside thing is something i've been subjected to. No, it's not nice, but i do feel there's a big difference between that sort of racism - a nuanced sort, if you like, and the absolute sort - absolute supremacy, the categorical devaluation of other races etc.
Most fish in different seas will at some point wonder about how much their identity has shifted or how they are perceived relative to their ancestral and contextual culture, but most don't think they're inferior to some other race, unless something has gone badly wrong. Coconut, banana, oreo... it's about identity and belonging and which 'culture' is considered better. It's actually pretty interesting, although of course when used as a racial slur it's unpleasant and damaging. Oh. i just realised something. I think the distinction (to me) is between a racial thing and a cultural thing with racial aspects. possibly.
ETA: Also, for what it's worth, i don't see a coconut, i see a bowling ball (without knowing the relevant story). It's stretching it to see a coconut, even with familiarity of old cartoons which do show coconut-heads.
Anyway, i'm not actually discussing anything here, right, you haven't seen me...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-23 08:48 pm (UTC)Carry on.